The Salaam Matrix is entirely designed and conceived by writer-creator Ramala Hubb’Allah (not official name, yet). The model was first generated after a classroom lecture in 2005, and developed over the next year. It was first published in 2008 in Triple Bottom Line Magazine, published by Asiatic Public Relations, Karachi, Pakistan. It was later discovered by Ramala that similar models such as Spiral Dynamics exist. However, any correlation with other models simply occurs to the fact that these models speak of universal truth identified by then disconnected thinkers and leaders over space and time. Today, the Internet connects the dots. May the best offer win!
We are not affiliated with Facebook/META or any of their social media platforms in any way. They bear no responsibility for us, nor we for them. Our content is shared on their platforms. The same applies for other social media platforms.
Critics and users make their own commentary and may development applications outside of a licensing model. We are not responsible for their interpretation and applications.
This in inherently a neutral tool that can be used for objectives “good” or “bad”. At the inception point, through our teachings and in our content, we steer the objectives towards creation, cooperation and benevolence. That said, we cannot guarantee the nature of applications by users.
This model promises clarity but not assured market success or financial renumeration of any sort. All users and learners will have to put in the work and find optimal usage. We can, however, promise clarity from our end, to those who are receptive and open.
A NOTE on our support for the cause we declare in the banner at the top of the website, the current copy of which, as of May 25 2024, reads as: “The Salaam Matrix favors the PEOPLE in Empire vs. the People, and condemns the GAZA genocide while advocating for just solutions. | Full launch soon.“: The Salaam Matrix is the creation of a Muslim writer-creator-designer, Ramala Hubb’Allah, whose aim is global peace, connectivity, ease and clarity of transactions, transactional correctness, and delivery of justice and fairness. It only behooves the creator of such a model and bearing such intention to make a declaration about the ongoing state of war, strife and chaos in the world. Ramala’s belief is that humanity needs to discover more of our common roots and practices than our surface, egoic differences and conflicts, in order to move forward into a new era of planetary existence and evolution of humankind. She thereby decries the war and the loss of life. She however also maintains that the “victim party” needs better approaches; and it is her aim to communicate the same through her teachings and social media. She has long maintained a perspective that is ancient and primordial and predates the origin of conflict in the political arena, and the strife experienced by the human psyche. Her teachings, when unpacked, reveal the “behind-the-scenes” story of why the human story takes place the way it does; thereby dissolving the perceptions of difference that we have. That said, the ordinary human perception perceives polarization, and the purpose of that polarization is to compel the organism to move: if the perception was homogenous, the organism would not be able to move. We move because we perceive a here & there, a this & that. The trouble is entrenchment in this perspective, getting frozen, choosing sides and fighting for them as if the sides matter, per se. They don’t, but temporally. Which means there is a here & there, and also, there isn’t a here & there in larger reality. You need a here & there to move and to decide and to grow and to live. But if you begin annihilating larger and total reality for it, then there is a problem, and a bystander decision-maker may intervene and choose a here & there for that specific space and time in order to make a decision and conclude the situation. Which is why, Ramala choose the people over the Empire at this moment, but also reminds that both are components of the larger reality. She also reminds that there are two sides to a conflict; however, warfare and loss of life tilts the situation, compelling the bystander to choose an oppressor and a victim based on the “score”. In her work, she steps into the temporal reality, but also pulls back and stand into the eternal to remind herself and her audience of some basics. So this is a paradox and a duality which will appear to be hypocritical, two-faced, chaotic or opportunistic without context. Ramala’s work is about contexts and designs and paradigms and the eternal and the basic, upon which the temporal is staged. Thank you.